Remember: If it had been legal to sell half of the first million doses of vaccine for $10,000 each, BioNTech could've easily gotten a $5 billion loan in April, and used that money to help scale up mRNA vaccine production to billions of doses. This is not the market outcome.
-
Show this thread
-
Eliezer Yudkowsky Retweeted
The bottleneck on the mRNA vaccines is the (new) encapsulation. There's a creative will to invest $5B in that exact step in March, that happens when there's a huge payout for getting that part right. "Do your job and get paid by the govt", not so much. https://twitter.com/brandonmcneice/status/1353212618274525187?s=20 …
Eliezer Yudkowsky added,
This Tweet is unavailable.4 replies 7 retweets 134 likesShow this thread -
Eliezer Yudkowsky Retweeted
The key phrase isn't "$5 billion", it's "and used the money to...", the incentive structure that would've paid & motivated BioNTech to make a lot of vaccine as early as possible. Govt carelessly set up an incentive structure to deliver X doses eventually. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1353392858288566272 …
Eliezer Yudkowsky added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 4 retweets 106 likesShow this thread -
Could more clever and altruistic and economically literate politicians, who weren't smarming voters by making a show of how much they were disgusted by dirty dirty profits, have set up a better govt contract with correct incentives? Sure! But that's the trouble with...
2 replies 4 retweets 109 likesShow this thread -
...trying to switch off the stuff that markets do automatically, and have politicians do it by hand; the politicians just don't understand what they're switching off, and how to replace it with careful detailed artificial structures. And have little motive to understand.
4 replies 6 retweets 153 likesShow this thread -
Govt: Writes time-insensitive contracts to pay a tiny fraction of what the vaccines are actually worth to us all. Result: Too few vaccines, too late. Econ illiterates: What could've possibly gone wrong? Maybe we should've paid less, to force Pfizer to make it up on volume?
4 replies 9 retweets 147 likesShow this thread -
Exam question #23: There is a SHORTAGE, a PRICE CONTROL, and a group of VOTERS yelling ANGRILY at anyone who suggests the two facts might be CORRELATED IN ANY WAY. Using your general knowledge of political history and economics, describe WHAT HAPPENED.
8 replies 26 retweets 203 likesShow this thread -
A very simplistic libertarian take, I know, I know. In reality, there's always a lot of details, a lot of additional theory, all kinds of extenuating circumstances... and... a SHORTAGE, a PRICE CONTROL, and people explaining why this is a TOTAL COINCIDENCE.
4 replies 10 retweets 141 likesShow this thread -
Eliezer Yudkowsky Retweeted Eliezer Yudkowsky
Eliezer Yudkowsky added,
Eliezer YudkowskyVerified account @ESYudkowskyReplying to @mattyglesias @jbarro @ModeledBehaviorI agree the initial tweet failed to cut to the heart of the matter. What was needed was huge payouts proportional to the real value of the vaccine, scaling with number of deliveries and with early time of delivery, as a prize accessible to multiple entities allowed to deliver.3 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
