*in particular* note that this virus is looking significantly more contagious and more deadly at the same time in contradiction to the trend of more contagious pathogens to be less deadly, maybe related to the fact that it is most infectious early, asymptomatic spreadhttps://twitter.com/DanielleFong/status/1352738045238378496 …
-
-
The "Over age 65: 86% efficacy *" refers to all people over 65. It doesn't give the efficacy for someone 65 exactly. Since the relationship between age and efficacy is almost certainly not linear, the statement isn't very useful.
-
It's likely that the efficacy remains 1) Personally high for a 65 year old 2) Strong enough for a herd immunity effect at bingo night despite any falloff after X age.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
