markets are pricing vaccines wrong, way too low, and distribution is even more inefficient.
-
Show this thread
-
some people with access to it are declining to take it, and vaccines are expiring. yet to many people, a vaccine could be priceless. imagine if the people who declined instead got a little stimulus for at least finding someone else who’ll take it, “selling,” if you will
12 replies 7 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
i think it is easy to be against this in general, but still support it in this case, as long as the problem is primarily one of distribution, in this case it could motivate a lot of distribution
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Gordon Mohr ꧁ 👁 👁꧂ Retweeted Gordon Mohr ꧁ 👁 👁꧂
a pure lottery of *transferable* vouchers could've created a highly-effective hybrid system: most doses flowing to neediest, all flowing to those who intensely-want-it, & even those sold more-acceptable because profit windfall goes to random winners:https://twitter.com/gojomo/status/1344740105844477952 …
Gordon Mohr ꧁ 👁 👁꧂ added,
Gordon Mohr ꧁ 👁 👁꧂ @gojomoReplying to @gojomo @JTLonsdalecould also spur some market- and diverse-channel innovation, even with govt's bias vs decentralization, via pure-lottery dose-voucher distro. then *individuals*, with all their varied prefs, democratically xfer to most-needy, or most-willing-to-pay, etc: https://twitter.com/gojomo/status/1344735955115102209 …2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
i very much agree with this, these ideas enable what seem to me to be a fine system
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
