markets are pricing vaccines wrong, way too low, and distribution is even more inefficient.
i think it is easy to be against this in general, but still support it in this case, as long as the problem is primarily one of distribution, in this case it could motivate a lot of distribution
-
-
a pure lottery of *transferable* vouchers could've created a highly-effective hybrid system: most doses flowing to neediest, all flowing to those who intensely-want-it, & even those sold more-acceptable because profit windfall goes to random winners:https://twitter.com/gojomo/status/1344740105844477952 …
-
(prices wouldn't stay high for long - and to extent those willing to pay so much perhaps were at higher risk, or losing more utility from vulnerability, vs those who win a voucher but prefer the money, "everyone" wins, & vaxes would be "pulled" towards demanding patients)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
