i mean you lose rdjt's tweets but justify a lot of agitation from the right at the same time as they ban sci0hub. don't think it's worth it honestly
-
-
Show this thread
-
i remember when the hammer came down on journalists covering the outbreak in China in Feb, and when people disagreed with the WHO, it was pretty bad.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
He's a direct imminent danger to the national security of the country at its most vulnerable point. Liberties also demand obligations.
-
which would justify a pretty lengthy suspension. but permanent? maybe. i just think the process should be better. we lost sci-hub on the same day. is it in the same way? who knows
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel the same way about labeling the DC chuds as terrorists/"seditionists" or wishing police brutality on them. That's only going to end with an expanded surveillance state and justification for more policing against the left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed...the cause was just. Even free speech has its limits, accountabilties, and responsibilities. It never was a free for all. The debate will continue...no Hitlers, Hirohitos, Mussolinis, or insurrectionist Trumps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
