“this is not true” lol
-
-
Replying to @pnfigueiredo
hahahaha yeah
@elonmusk has made a real update in what's possible. we really should build a Mars colony soon. I think it will be critical to creating an independent political realm, we need a frontier in order to be free again. If empires cannot expand, we end up with conflict.3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @elonmusk
I’m interested in the opportunity of creating a governance system from scratch, given all we’re exploring around decentralization. He seems to be thinking deeply about these issues toohttps://youtu.be/Ig_-P6q_yAQ
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @pnfigueiredo @elonmusk
Yes, I'm thinking of doing this! My idea is to make a global AR system on earth (& elsewhere) with noneuclidean geometry where you can pack as much virtual stuff into any space as you like, & tie this together with the virtual world. & then root a map of this into property rights
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @elonmusk
Wow non Euclidean VR I have to try thishttps://youtu.be/ztsi0CLxmjw
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @pnfigueiredo @elonmusk
Actual space is non-euclidean! But I will have demo, uhhh, real soon now ™ This talk by William Thurston at the Clay Research Conference is *incredible.*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jdmkUQDWtQ …
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @elonmusk
This reminds me of a theory I read about many years ago that each point in space corresponds to a Calabi-Yau manifold w/ 6 dimensions. Space would then be 10-dimensional (inc. time). “The elegant universe” may or may not be dated by now but god was that a mind opening read.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pnfigueiredo @elonmusk
There's something astonishing interesting that we're reaching towards, but bullies have stopped progress in physics (and magic) for many decades, centuries even. I got a chance to spar a bit with Ed Witten, John Horton Conway, and David Mermin at a talk at Princeton...
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
I am totally with John H. Conway and Ed Witten on trying to reach beyond our current understanding of physics, breaking past the confusion that arises from Q measurement. Quantum Physics is a linearized theory, & we have overfit the error! There is a problem with our epistemology
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Evan O'Leary Retweeted 🤷🏻♀️
Do you know if & where Weinstein explains the confusion like this?https://twitter.com/DanielleFong/status/1277234007210700800 …
Evan O'Leary added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Huh, so he has a problem with probability being used to respond to loaded questions - does this have to do with linearity? (0:58 he says no good quantum theorist would explain quantum uncertainty with perturbation by measurement, but Susskind does here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h1E3YJMKfA&feature=youtu.be&t=3855 …)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
