I suspect we don't even have yet the math theory/framework to generate music at a symphonic level, and maybe not even the computer power... yet
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @lilchiva @DanielSamanez3 and
Music, art, food, resonate because they embed human errors within. That’s why we love them because we can aspire to that level. Creating purely computational music is to deprive it of emotion thus rendering impotent.
2 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @AhsanDeliri @lilchiva and
There is a reason why it's impossible to replicate a Stradivarius or a Guarnieri del Gesù. Mastery of the lutist + properties of the materials + mastery of the musician = too much
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It does underscore how new technologies paradoxically adds value to unmediated performance in almost any field. So I think it is significant in a social sense. If we just use digital technologies to remake everything we already had without them, what exactly is our advantage?
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
This is a great point!
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
The medium is the message after all. Know your tools and know the history of your field.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Douglas Coupland said something really interesting about McLuhan once and it has stuck with me. He said McLuhan was trying to tell us what came after the internet - using Finnegan's Wake. It puts it all into perspective, just how crazy he was, and also how prescient.
2 replies 4 retweets 7 likes
i love those brains
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
