The most toxic misunderstanding in the current wave of centralized social media censorship is “you’re not owed an audience.” But FB / Reddit / Twitter never gave anyone (let alone the right) an audience for free. You still have to build that yourslf, w nobody forced to follow you
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Altimor
algorithmic feeds make this more complicated for FB/Twitter. Since it is getting distributed to more than just people you follow. And their is demand/supply imbalance of attention slots Which is distinction from platforms with pure follow and get 100% models
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @kevinakwok
But there’s a difference between “we won’t feature you to non followers anymore” (still problematic) and “we’ll shut down thousands of communities that aggregated over years / forbid people from following you even if they want to”
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Altimor
I haven't really gotten around into looking at reddit's recent actions yet. Which was why specifically was talking about FB/Twitter For the reddit communities shut down to *followers* be justified, agree needs to be about them inflicting commons harm. Otherwise more questionable
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kevinakwok @Altimor
but haven't looked into yet--def on list to
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
i’m pretty sure this account has been algorithmically limited / hidden in the searches multiple times. they don’t even show it. there are so many complex and meaningful design questions around the algorithms and the moderation around online communities
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
