Why I think that climate tech is the best way to pivot our future in a sustainable direction better than any other method: https://snigdha.substack.com/p/pivoting-the-future-with-climate …
big thanks to the friends: @startuployalist @aroraharshita33 @DanielleFong <3
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @snigdhar0y @startuployalist and
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) Retweeted Adam Townsend
good intro read into a very srs issue personally against carbon taxes cause a lot more problems rooted in reality than in theory see: https://twitter.com/adamscrabble/status/1193246877443141638 … Future of "green energy" is nuclear energy once they fix their image problem
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @1EpikTeTuS @snigdhar0y and
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) Retweeted Office of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear happens to be both the cleanest and most efficient fuel source. When the public starts getting access to microreactors a lot of energy problems gonna be solved https://twitter.com/GovNuclear/status/1276523391277838336?s=20 … https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/nuclear-power-most-reliable-energy-source-and-its-not-even-close …
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1EpikTeTuS @snigdhar0y and
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) Retweeted Sen. Lisa Murkowski
1EpikTeTuS (3,3)(∞) added,
Sen. Lisa MurkowskiVerified account @lisamurkowskiI spoke at the New Nuclear Capital 2019 Summit on the value of advanced reactors for climate & energy security. Small nuclear reactors & microreactors can produce reliable electricity w/ zero emissions at a size appropriate for the grid, solving energy access & climate concerns. pic.twitter.com/NKxSVDqaCeShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1EpikTeTuS @snigdhar0y and
when you start actually looking into the alternatives a lot of them are just optimistic memes solar energy via panels produce lot of toxic waste wind energy is geo-based (literally need wind) and noise pollution geothermal/hydro are good but too geo-specific
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1EpikTeTuS @snigdhar0y and
these are extremely overblown by the way. The amount of toxic waste from solar panels is low and it’s getting lower & is vastly lower than the amount associated with for example coal for example shale oil, for example tar sands oil. Wind is location dependent but noise can be low
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
we have a small wind farm here in Nova Scotia with big 2.5 MW turbines that have a 45 m radius. The sound around it is kind of a light wooshing. even right below it. it’s not really a problem. it’s pleasant actually. Not disruptive
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @snigdhar0y and
hydro can be very cost-effective and very useful and it can also be related to managing floodwaters. but can also damage ecosystems
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @snigdhar0y and
I like hydro most next to nuclear, but still geo-dependent, you can't prop those up in a desert
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Quick thread about carbon taxes, climate change, taxes and you. Let's begin...