Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
DanielleFong's profile
🤷🏻‍♀️
🤷🏻‍♀️
 🤷🏻‍♀️
@DanielleFong

Tweets

 🤷🏻‍♀️

@DanielleFong

💓

Empire of the Future
Joined February 2008

Tweets

  • © 2022 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @DanielleFong

      The practice of press releasing early research in the midst of a public health crisis is an extremely worrying trend. It damages public trust in science at a time when that is dangerous. This study just shows that it can replicate inside cells in a lab, not inside patients.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    2.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish

      it is indeed evidence, and when this is added to the evidence of neurological symptoms it seems very important to release this information. there's no such thing as a scientists web for coronavirus really because it's happening too quickly. agree that there is manipulation.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @DanielleFong

      There are other ways to communicate with fellow scientists that aren’t a public facing news outlet. There are journals, bulletins, email lists. This was press released by a comms department.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish

      Could be

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @DanielleFong

      I have an MSc in science communication and I used to work in a comms department, I’m 98% sure that’s how it went down. It’s not as egregious as other examples of small/preprint/speculative studies hitting the headlines but it’s part of a concerning pattern.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    6. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish @DanielleFong

      Research hits headlines with something like ‘proof of first cases in Wuhan in AUGUST’ or ‘asymptomatic transmission of covid is rare’ and that headline spreads and becomes the story. It’s then walked back or debunked but it’s too late.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    7.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish

      yeah that bullshit is the worst. I think this is very different from those cases though.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @DanielleFong

      Why is this different?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish

      it's not an announcement from WHO, which specifically has the job of informing people of the difference between asymptomatic and presymptomatic it's specifically said that it's the *first* direct *evidence* that *could* infect the brain, the headline is epistemically valid.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @DanielleFong

      The public don’t give a shit about ‘epistemically valid’. Most people won’t even read past the headline. It’s reckless and short sighted. Buuut what do I know, it’s only something I’ve studied in depth 🤷🏻‍♀️

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
       🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
      Replying to @Sorrelish

      not trying to upset you. all media is like this. it's a shitty system. but i think it's an extra and complicating burden to have to moderate yourself for how you will be misunderstood. a near majority of the public believes the coronavirus was a hoax. believes darwin is a hoax.

      6:14 PM - 15 Jun 2020
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
          Replying to @DanielleFong @Sorrelish

          i think it's different in the ways I expressed, if you are saying it's mainly the same in the way that it's reckless and short sighted, I think, yes, this too is way below what it could be, but it's in an atmosphere of like, TheHill calling Trump's rally in Tulsa post-corona

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. vodka margarine‏ @Sorrelish 15 Jun 2020
          Replying to @DanielleFong

          I’m not upset, I just don’t think you know what you’re talking about and it’s frustrating that you’re not willing to consider that *maybe* this is a knowable process that people have studied.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3.  🤷🏻‍♀️‏ @DanielleFong 15 Jun 2020
          Replying to @Sorrelish

          I've done science communication work as part of my professional responsibilities for 12 years. I just think I have a different perspective i'm bringing. I'm not insistent on my point of view.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2022 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info