The practice of press releasing early research in the midst of a public health crisis is an extremely worrying trend. It damages public trust in science at a time when that is dangerous. This study just shows that it can replicate inside cells in a lab, not inside patients.
maybe i'm a hold out for / from an internet that tries to communicate epistemically correct things and or possible things and or jokes and it's basically understood that you have to figure it out. somehow, we have to communicate. not a fan of censorship or self censorship
-
-
It’s not censorship to only release research when its past peer review. That’s how science communication works. If it didn’t, there would be absolute chaos. Papers get knocked back at peer review all the time. Retraction seriously damages public trust.
-
I agree with that, but I also think there should be a stratum of preprints. This is specifically not cool, I can't get the paper. Censorship I'm talking about is algo censorship on social media platforms and google suffered by whistleblowers like
@nanogenomic@drericding and I
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
