Theories of change are important to discuss and criticize!
-
-
Replying to @edelwax
I agree, it's just that the mirror image of your critique can be leveled towards the 'institutional design will save the world' people. In reality it's a complex feedback loop and they need to bootstrap each other
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This is how Power comes into play - systemic design leads to more powerful top-down changes (nations, cities, individuals), while a transformed individual has to compete with Game A System + other voices, basically failing to create Critical Escape Velocity 99% of times.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
99.9% by my estimates, or worse. it's 1/1000 at the large scales. it's just hidden because of the semi-effectiveness of copying
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
could you please expand on "because of the semi-effectiveness of copying"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
lots of organisations and cities. & business types are just copying a basic idea which is innovated elsewhere, and making more minor changes, as opposed to inventing new paradigms. those are good businesses, but they are not the main source of value creation, often new paradigms
1 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
aha! so there's a lot of activity, buzz, noise about developments while the signal and funding of actual paradigm-shifting ideation/projects is greatly reduced. hence, very few ongoing inspiring projects - cannot create the critical mass to reach the tipping point for AWESOMENESS
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
-
precisely. that is why burning man is so awesome. it is a place for awesomeness.
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
and the rest of the world is mostly uninspiring. We need a million Dynamiclands and weekly Burning Mans! Weekdays in Dynamicland, Weekends in Burning Man!
2 replies 2 retweets 1 like
This is my plan!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
