Those of you who are thinking I should get peer-reviewed - wait for a few months before telling the world? One needs to understand peer-review means nothing - a few experts just checking what is possible to check. It doesnt mean the paper is infallible, nothing in science is.https://twitter.com/sanchak74/status/1069910431957901312 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @sanchak74 @DanielleFong
To be fair, for the layman peer review is meant to separate the charlatans from the real scientists. However I get your point. If we had more scientific literacy in the general population it would help a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Trinitydraco1 @DanielleFong
sandeep chakraborty Retweeted sandeep chakraborty
I agree, pls read the second tweet. I am here to answer/address any question. But if they dont look now you think they will look when I submit in a journal? Lancet et all wont even give a look. And I will spend time formatting, coverletter, submission..https://twitter.com/sanchak74/status/1257857389337776128 …
sandeep chakraborty added,
sandeep chakraborty @sanchak74Here's good review - have addressed several of these and uploaded a new version. Experts can easily do the same - and non-experts too (some of whom have come up with great questions). This is how reviews work, esp in a pandemic - a continuum. A paper is never ever 100% correct pic.twitter.com/8bQ0Xh6M4vShow this thread4 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
I have no false pride - I am willing to beg/beseech someone to take a look. But most ppl dont realize that wont help. They just wont - and sometimes they really dont have the capability. Can they program? Analyze the sequences? Who will do it for them? So best is to ignore.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @sanchak74 @Trinitydraco1
Yeah people aren't trying so hard.
@nanogenomic and@ID_AA_Carmack are doing great work@Pravduh15 too1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @sanchak74 and
Sandeep I will give this a good deep dive when I have some free cycles. I'm prioritizing the fundraise for
@nanogenomic2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @sanchak74 and
You really are an amazing human you know that? I wouldn't even know how to begin funding anything! Let alone all the rest. I can sing, read quickly, learn some things rapidly and I have a lot of heart but I wouldn't know how to begin turning that into money or business.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Trinitydraco1 @sanchak74 and
Where I started was the essays of Paul Graham!
@paulg http://www.paulgraham.com2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @sanchak74 and
So they look beautiful too. I have a bunch of the silk and high thread count cotton flannel coming in. Layering those fabrics creates a static electric charge that make them work. They are lighter and easier to breath through to help some people refusing to wear them.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Excellent! Yes I am interested in helping you and investing. Send me stuff! (publicly or DM)
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @sanchak74 and
I will write up the proposal, with the data to back up my mask design and what I would need to scale up production. Here are some pics of an early prototype and the new silk I have coming in. I lucked in to a 16oz box of high end fabric bolt ends in a rainbow of colors
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.