Those of you who are thinking I should get peer-reviewed - wait for a few months before telling the world? One needs to understand peer-review means nothing - a few experts just checking what is possible to check. It doesnt mean the paper is infallible, nothing in science is.https://twitter.com/sanchak74/status/1069910431957901312 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @sanchak74 @DanielleFong
To be fair, for the layman peer review is meant to separate the charlatans from the real scientists. However I get your point. If we had more scientific literacy in the general population it would help a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Trinitydraco1 @DanielleFong
sandeep chakraborty Retweeted sandeep chakraborty
I agree, pls read the second tweet. I am here to answer/address any question. But if they dont look now you think they will look when I submit in a journal? Lancet et all wont even give a look. And I will spend time formatting, coverletter, submission..https://twitter.com/sanchak74/status/1257857389337776128 …
sandeep chakraborty added,
sandeep chakraborty @sanchak74Here's good review - have addressed several of these and uploaded a new version. Experts can easily do the same - and non-experts too (some of whom have come up with great questions). This is how reviews work, esp in a pandemic - a continuum. A paper is never ever 100% correct pic.twitter.com/8bQ0Xh6M4vShow this thread4 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Non mais les journalistes et autre chercheurs, biologistes, docteurs... Eux le verrons. Je pense qu'il faut que tu gaspilles de ton temps à essayer et ne pas avoir à regretter !
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The Lancet and the NEJM are still working pretty fast. If we find something good and I understand it maybe I can take on an attempt to get something through as a coauthor or something
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.