was Holmes not a fraud? :o
-
-
Replying to @goblinodds @stevebloom55 and
WSJ is a *massive* fraud. Literally they were like "oh, this is impossible to do, and look at the data" and they posted a paper, and the data was *excellent!*
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @stevebloom55 and
whoaaaaaa :o (i thought she was indicted for falsifying test results though?)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @goblinodds @stevebloom55 and
This is part of a takedown effort by the shareholders of Quest. They literally schemed to make this happen.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @stevebloom55 and
ooof! how'd you get accurate info on this??
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @goblinodds and
then i studied other takedowns, including watching people try to take down *my* company, as well as Tesla, and Amazon, and Microsoft, and Apple, and
@nanogenomic, and Nikola Tesla (in the past), and many others.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @goblinodds and
the WSJ is literally murdering people with their inept coverage of this virus
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @goblinodds and
Holmes is currently working on a blood test. Literally Theranos would have worked here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @goblinodds and
Holmes made the mistake of overpromising and underdelivering. Had she been honest about the tests that did work, rather than claiming that hundreds of tests were functional, they’d still be in business. Pin-prick COVID tests are basically Theranos technology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
i do agree with this sadly, but it does not excuse the wsj from abuse
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.