-
-
Replying to @likelytobeeaten @DanielleFong and
Okay. Y'all. What in the h*ck is this infinite absurdist gif thread I am trapped in, precisely?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @alexandria_jaye @likelytobeeaten and
I'm equally confused. This is a thread about redesigning twitter threads?
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @djbaskin @alexandria_jaye and
Sorry for the confusion! Yes this is about turning Twitter into something like a Memex Imagine if Twitter were *smart* and multidimensional and had a memory. I tagged you because you are awesome. Sorry!
Or read Vannevar Bush, who imagined this in 1945https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ …4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @djbaskin and
I get it and it should be possible. Twitter could be used as a graph database. But the tweets themselves would lose individual legibility as the representation later moves up, if that makes sense?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mykola @DanielleFong and
*layer, sigh. Anyway 30-person threads are an exercise in how twitter could be better imo, heh. It becomes a context-collapse distributed over time.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
yes, but a 30 person party with you all would be wonderful, right? this is what I hope to build.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
-
Replying to @malnote
ooooh, gosh. if I *had* to pick *one* it's probably Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
