yeah obviously WHO from 2 months ago was not trustworthy. i think they wouldn’t be saying this though, if they had not meant it. they have never been stoking panic, always urging caution of caution! this is now the other way
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I believe this is the more specific WHO statement being quoted - and as I see it interpreted to the point of redefinition:https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/immunity-passports-in-the-context-of-covid-19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its not quite as bad as it sounds, reinfections should be much less dangerous, but it first round survivors can probably still act as carriers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.