This is a very beautiful thought that does not belong on twitter. You need to sandbox it and not get entranced by your own dreams, even if they are good ones
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @wildflowerearth
Chi is as real as other functionally predictive mental representations, but it probably does not work like you imagine
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
i dunno how you imagine I imagine it! i'm seeing all kinds of crazy long range magnetic effects that move magnets, colors, trees, and nervous energy with much much more powerful interactions than 1/r^2. i'd love to have another physicist at close range to pin it down.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wildflowerearth
I don’t doubt that you are seeing this, but our senses are not reliable. You need to prove that you are not overfitting.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
to who?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wildflowerearth
I am not talking about social proof. There is no subject, no “who”.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz @wildflowerearth
Epistemology: you are in one of the possible universes, you cannot know which one. You must not just pick one but maintain all possibilities and assign confidence according to evidence to obtain probability distributions.
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @wildflowerearth
It’s not clear if it is possible that 5G can disturb population level chi. I don’t know how to quantify that. Physicists don’t model chi (for the same reason that they don’t model agency). You have to do a lot of paradigm setting and original research for a statement like yours.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz @wildflowerearth
Oh I see the confusion. Yeah I don't know chi is messed mainly from 5g. I think the main electronic effect is just regular light + regular old AC current, but then we have a recent effect from bad flickery LEDs and florescents and 2.4 Ghz from microwaves and wifi & solar wind
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @wildflowerearth
Chi is not electromagnetic, it’s emergent structural
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
but yes it's emergent structural yes that too Joscha.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.