1/2 @MikeBenchCapon Now, if you're going to critique arithmetic (like Berkeley did calculus), why not start with "imaginary numbers"? Even the name implies something is wonky, in a sense BEYOND that in which all numbers are "imaginary"!
-
Show this thread
-
2/2 You can dress them up and call them "complex numbers" so they can sit in a pew at the Church of reality. But "i" itself isn't complex at all. It is perfectly simply while still being ... imaginary. How can that even be a thing?
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

