Price is not a signal you should trust any more. The efficient markets hypothesis has a hole in it the size of my 16,000,000% IRR.
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
yeah I wish I'd had some capital to take advantage of this. EMH isn't perfect but the market is better than nothing here. People did actually try to stockpile this stuff and now can't sell it because of legislation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijicUK
god, i did tell them exactly what to do. I am going to do what a scottish distillery did and fractally subdivide a patch of signal rights over land in a nova scotia island so that people can actually participate in this crazy wave and end up with legal and physical rights.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Sometimes I think that
@DanielleFong is actually just an AI. 50% of posts are amazing insights, 50% total gibberish.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijicUK @DanielleFong
What the f**k does "fractally divide up signal rights" mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @RokoMijicUK
good for understanding fractals: http://acko.net/blog/how-to-fold-a-julia-fractal/ … my idea is to embed a map into like a patch of land. you can put "spirits" or "signals" or "souls" in it but they're physically linked to the location that is factually on earth. these are linked to an AI for accounts
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @RokoMijicUK
since the fractal nature means you can put as much as you want, I decided to go 3d. so that means this math is what we need.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jdmkUQDWtQ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong @RokoMijicUK
the idea is to be able to host a "currency" with a tighter timing loop than the world -- there's a lot of concepts. sorry this i all I can say I. the time I have, come back next time when you know about 3-manifolds!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong
I know about manifolds, I have a degree in mathematics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is fresh, man, since Perleman. It's the geometrization conjecture that Perelman proved, plus the Banach Tarski theorem in probability space that allows for a non-flat geometry to still look flattened (general relativity) there's no chance you could have been taught that.
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
Ok, you've changed my mind. You're definitely not an AI
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.