"Nutrition scientist"--would that appease you? And the R0 was not correct at the time of publication and again, not only about the number but the nonsensical "never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in my entire career" and terrifying people.
-
-
Replying to @aetiology @z1y2x3 and
How about "epidemiologist," because he has two doctoral degrees and one of them in epidemiology.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @z1y2x3 and
Which has led to a lot of misrepresentation of his expertise, which is the exact problem under discussion. I asked him to acknowledge his lack of expertise in infect disease in the twitter thread he was snitch-tagged into of mine, & he refused to do so.
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @aetiology @z1y2x3 and
I think we've reached the point where we're going in circles. I follow/RT/learn from a lot of ppl on here re: COVID19 who are in different disciplines. Some adjacent, some not. Eric is one of them, & he's more adjacent that many. I just am not seeing that he's as unqualified...
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @aetiology and
...as you're trying to represent. Furthermore, I feel like there's a bunch of professional jealousy and name calling around this that I loath and that sets me off.
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @aetiology and
Finally, you're trying to get ppl not to signal boost Eric for professional turf reasons, meanwhile some of the ppl you yourself are signal boosting are legitimately bad actors on here. Their behavior is exceedingly boorish & bullying, & they spread their own type of misinfo.
5 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @z1y2x3 and
Sigh. It is not for "turf" reasons. Why do you keep referring to that? Seems more like projection than anything when I've explained this in depth.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @aetiology @z1y2x3 and
Perhaps, but this is what it looks like. It looks like a pissing match. I'm so sorry, I really am because I believe that you do not believe that's what this is. But to literally everyone who has ever witnessed pissing contest, we are pattern matching at like 90% here.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @aetiology and
The idea that this one guy is a big fat menace to professional ID twitter is bananas. The continued obsession with him... it just really has all the hallmarks of a turf war. I dunno what else to tell you. It looks hella bad.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @jonst0kes @z1y2x3 and
Professional ID twitter is just fine. It's the general public I'm concerned about, because he is being used as a subject matter expert by over 80k followers & by media sources who don't know when he's wrong or exaggerating & when he's not. That's a huge problem.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
it seems you are part of a twitter mob, which is also a problem.
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @aetiology and
For calling out someone that isint trained in something and pretending that he is?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.