1/To add some context, the minister mocks her because she seems too "soft" compared with other members of her own party. Which is, to say the least, very silly. But his whole line of argument during the debate was to prove he was stronger on Islamism than her. Which is scary
-
-
Show this thread
-
2/ See the account in le Monde for example (not an anti-Macron journal by any standards):https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2021/02/12/debat-marine-le-pen-gerald-darmanin-la-dediabolisation-par-procuration_6069774_823448.html …
Show this thread -
3/ So there is a degree of irony in how he tells it that is not fully grasped by the scene. But at the same time it does also illustrates perfectly the message he wanted to pass during the whole debate: Le Pen is not serious about Islamism, but I'am.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's simply because it's not wrong
End of conversation
-
-
-
hey @the42question what's the exact translation here
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trying to appropriate far-right arguments has never worked. Macron is making a big mistake
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He literally says that she is soft compared to what other members of her party say about Muslims and that they will be disappointed. He also suggest that this softness is actually insincere and just an attempt to appeal to moderate voters. Why do you lie about that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Turns out Macron 2017 = Le Pen 2022 was correct, but in a really unexpected way
-
France seriously should’ve gone with Melenchon.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.