Conversation

Doesn't change the fact that it's not an ad hominem attack. I'm talking about his behavior here where he falls back on strawman arguments again and again, misrepresents what I've stated and ignores most of what I've said and pretends as if he hadn't seen it to debate dishonestly.
1
When people are people incredibly dishonest and underhanded, I'm not going to be polite to them, sorry. It's odd you're choosing to defend the person who has repeatedly engaged in those tactics and you're attacking me for calling them out for it. Really not a good look for you.
1
1
You said so to me yourself. Are you now denying that you work with the group of people who have orchestrated a libel and harassment campaign targeting me including publishing a 1 hour hit piece full of fabrications about me on YouTube? You previously admitted you do.
1
I once told you I have a "slight relationship with Nick." Taken in context, that "slight relationship" is that we both have talked to each other about our work with Tor and privacy. That's it. If you have any hard evidence of me working with any known abuser, please show it.
2
They are a known abuser. They are well documented as engaging in a libel and harassment campaign towards me including trying to push spin that I'm delusional, insane, etc. They worked with a YouTube influencer who orchestrated most of the harassment and libel campaign towards me.
1