So, Daniel, what you are implying is that you want the Americans to revoke #Section230 of the Communications Decency Act so that platforms share liability for what their users say, so therefore then #Cloudflare can block them under Terms of Use?
Conversation
Once again, you're making a completely disingenuous and dishonest argument. Kiwi Farms doesn't have an issue with moderation. It has plenty of moderation. Kiwi Farms actively organizes doxxing, harassment and libel campaigns against trans and autistic people. You're full of shit.
2
5
I wonder, perhaps, if there's a better way to articulate a given position without resorting to ad hominem attacks.
2
1
Stating that an argument is completely dishonest and disingenuous isn't an ad hominem attack. It's who is repeatedly resorting to strawman arguments and misrepresentations of what I've stated over and over. You're essentially doing the same thing right now.
2
5
My comment was regards to the "you're full of shit" statement. I wonder if there's a better way to appeal to convince than such a phrase.
1
Doesn't change the fact that it's not an ad hominem attack. I'm talking about his behavior here where he falls back on strawman arguments again and again, misrepresents what I've stated and ignores most of what I've said and pretends as if he hadn't seen it to debate dishonestly.
1
When people are people incredibly dishonest and underhanded, I'm not going to be polite to them, sorry. It's odd you're choosing to defend the person who has repeatedly engaged in those tactics and you're attacking me for calling them out for it. Really not a good look for you.
1
1
After re-reading my statements, I'm convinced I'm not defending either of you.
1
1
I already know you support and work with abusers so it's not really a surprise to see you trying to tone police in a dishonest way.
1
> I already know you support and work with abusers
This is a serious accusation. Please state your evidence.
1
You said so to me yourself. Are you now denying that you work with the group of people who have orchestrated a libel and harassment campaign targeting me including publishing a 1 hour hit piece full of fabrications about me on YouTube? You previously admitted you do.
I once told you I have a "slight relationship with Nick."
Taken in context, that "slight relationship" is that we both have talked to each other about our work with Tor and privacy. That's it.
If you have any hard evidence of me working with any known abuser, please show it.
2
Sorry, I should have written "small relationship", not "slight relationship."
1
Show replies