Conversation

Replying to

and

It's you who doesn't do your research. I suggest reading twitter.com/DanielMicay/st. Cloudflare using content blocking lists from far right evangelical groups who consider LGBTQ content immoral and therefore 'adult content' is not a mistake by Cloudflare. They still use those lists.

Quote Tweet

Daniel Micay

@DanielMicay

Sep 2

I know several people working as software engineers at Cloudflare. According to one of them, this incident (blog.cloudflare.com/the-mistake-th) was hardly a mistake. Cloudflare is including block lists sourced from far right evangelical groups as part of their 'family friendly' DNS service.

Show this thread

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

That blog post is about the 1.1.1.3 'family friendly' DNS service and has NOTHING TO DO with Cloudflare banning sex worker sites from using their DDoS protection service. Cloudflare banned sites like Switter from DDoS protection. Cloudflare doesn't ban Kiwi Farms from it.

Replying to

and

So, Daniel, what you are implying is that you want the Americans to revoke #Section230 of the Communications Decency Act so that platforms share liability for what their users say, so therefore then #Cloudflare can block them under Terms of Use?

en.wikipedia.org

Section 230 - Wikipedia

Replying to

and

Once again, you're making a completely disingenuous and dishonest argument. Kiwi Farms doesn't have an issue with moderation. It has plenty of moderation. Kiwi Farms actively organizes doxxing, harassment and libel campaigns against trans and autistic people. You're full of shit.

Replying to

and

I wonder, perhaps, if there's a better way to articulate a given position without resorting to ad hominem attacks.

Replying to

and

Stating that an argument is completely dishonest and disingenuous isn't an ad hominem attack. It's

@AlecMuffett

who is repeatedly resorting to strawman arguments and misrepresentations of what I've stated over and over. You're essentially doing the same thing right now.

Replying to

Don't expect me to continue following you, to remain one of my followers or to remain welcome in the GrapheneOS community if you're going to misrepresent my tweets and support someone who is repeatedly being dishonest and engaging in underhanded tactics to support a doxxing site.

Replying to

and

I did none of what you claimed. I'm simply wondering if there's a way for a calmer conversation, one that can provide convincing arguments. Note that I do not support KF or any other hateful rhetoric or community. My comment was meant solely as an appeal to refine commentary.

Replying to

and

What you're doing is tone policing someone that's part of a marginalized community targeted by Kiwi Farms based on how they're engaging with someone 'debating' with them by repeatedly misrepresenting their statements with strawman arguments and disingenuous spin about them.

Replying to

Tone policing autistic people unwilling to engage in fake politeness towards someone repeatedly and blatantly misrepresenting their arguments and using underhanded/dishonest debate tactics with them is not exactly a way of showing you support those people.

10:14 PM · Sep 3, 2022Twitter Web App

Likes