Conversation

Replying to and
It's hardly absolutist free speech to believe that publishing code to provide people with financial privacy is not violating any laws. Privacy itself is a right covered by multiple parts of the US constitution. Publicly publishing all your transactions is not a legal requirement.
1
Replying to and
Financial privacy is not money laundering. It's only money laundering if you're hiding the proceeds of a crime. That's how the term is defined and the laws are defined. People using it for other reasons were not violating any US laws.
1
Replying to and
News to me that we all live under governments which are held to the will of the voting public. The majority of the public deciding that sex workers, trans people, recreational drugs, etc. should be criminalized also doesn't make it right. Plenty of laws are clearly immoral.
1
1
Replying to and
The authors of a program are responsible for foreseeing its potential for failure, misuse, or abuse. That's the first goddamn rule of engineering certification, and it's disturbing that software engineers get away without learning it, nevermind committing to it.
1