Since when does the First Amendment come above the trust in the Constitution and laws that define it? If you create a "trustless" society -- the stated goal of cryptocurrency leaders -- then the First Amendment is just a piece of paper because it isn't a Solidity contract.
Conversation
At what point does it make sense to undermine the very legal framework that guarantees your freedom of speech?
1
The First Amendment isn't a natural law or part of the cosmic order, it's a thingy written down by people 250 years ago that people could change if they liked.
Absolutist freedom of speech isn't a coherent ideology, because it condones its own destruction.
2
It's hardly absolutist free speech to believe that publishing code to provide people with financial privacy is not violating any laws. Privacy itself is a right covered by multiple parts of the US constitution. Publicly publishing all your transactions is not a legal requirement.
1
Doesn't make much sense to claim that when the topic is a port of the traditional Zcash technology to an Ethereum smart contract...
1
The blockchain has a *PUBLIC* record of every transaction committed, of every Solidity contract executed.
2
The topic is a port of the traditional Zcash technology to Ethereum. Tornado Cash was essentially a shielded pool on Ethereum. It's strange to call end-to-end encrypted data public. It was not some hosted mixing service or just obfuscation. They had to track it going to/from it.
1
You can't just say "ooh, encrypted black box, can't tell who's using it" when there's a public record of everyone who put money into the encrypted black box.
1
Not actually how it works. There are decentralized exchanges where you can exchange cash for Monero, shielded Zcash, etc. Tornado Cash itself is not simply a 'decentralized mixer' where you sent funds through it and ended up with them outside it elsewhere. Not what it is.