Conversation

Replying to
The very idea of cryptocurrency — of code that actively redefines reality so that human laws cannot contain it — is inherently risky to the continued existence of human society, because it undermines the human-to-human trust that society requires as a prerequisite.
2
Replying to
Since when does the First Amendment come above the trust in the Constitution and laws that define it? If you create a "trustless" society -- the stated goal of cryptocurrency leaders -- then the First Amendment is just a piece of paper because it isn't a Solidity contract.
2
Replying to and
It's hardly absolutist free speech to believe that publishing code to provide people with financial privacy is not violating any laws. Privacy itself is a right covered by multiple parts of the US constitution. Publicly publishing all your transactions is not a legal requirement.
1
Show replies