Mass adoption of Bitcoin would be a mass surveillance dream due to the lack of on-chain privacy. It also won't be censorship resistant without privacy.
Still not too late for Bitcoin to add serious on-chain privacy via encryption rather than obfuscation, but it's getting there.
Conversation
Replying to
bitcoin won't just magically add privacy. you want something added to bitcoin, open a pr. its open source software.
1
1
Replying to
People submitting high quality pull requests implementing protocol changes isn't how Bitcoin works at this point. In the early years? Sure.
Solving it is almost entirely a political issue, not a technical one. Zcash already made the technology needed to deploy this for Bitcoin.
1
1
4
There was just a soft fork last year to add support for Schnorr signatures. Why couldn't a PR to add Zcash-like encryption follow a similar path to get merged and activated in bitcoin?
2
I mean, if it won't get in with a high quality PR, what do you think it would actually take to get it in?
1
An outsider submitting a new protocol feature with a high quality PR and then having that get reviewed and then accepted by a few other developers is really not how Bitcoin works in 2022...
Can still happen for implementation-specific Lightning extensions but not Bitcoin itself.
I don't think you seriously believe that someone can simply submit a very high quality working on-chain privacy implementation to Bitcoin Core and have that get reviewed or accepted. It would take them years of wrangling with politics and getting many people on board with it.
2
The first step to making a significant protocol extension is definitely not implementing something and submitting a pull request.
Do you think Taproot, a dramatically smaller and less controversial change, was done that way? No, it has years of discussions, planning, etc. first.
2
Show replies