Conversation

Replying to and
Can't really say that's good until you run an experiment with false reporting and get no takedowns. In this domain I'd really rather have 1000 malware C2's remain up than one legitimate small time domain owner ruined with no easy recovery.
5
20
We use Google Domains with the Advanced Protection Program enabled because that gives us a fair bit of confidence in the domains not being stolen through an authentication or customer support vulnerability. We self-host our DNS so it's about who we trust to keep us in control.
1
5
We host nearly all the GrapheneOS infrastructure on OVH but their domain registrar isn't very good. We have grapheneos.ovh for testing it and we've experienced issues like downtime due to a DNSSEC issue on their end. It would have been horrible if it was our main domain.
OVH divides things up into different departments and the domain registrar / managed DNS features aren't part of Bare Metal Cloud (traditional VPS, dedicated servers) or Public Cloud (core AWS clone) but rather the far less robust Web Cloud portion of it focused on shared hosting.
1
1
It would be nice if other platforms had an equivalent to the Advanced Protection Program where you can disable a bunch of insecure legacy authentication, mandate FIDO2 and require far stricter account recovery, etc. Have had abuse handling / customer support abused way too often.
1
3
Show replies