Conversation

i don't particularly like this stuff but i really hate the kind of arguments that come up! the Letter in Support of Responsible Fintech Policy's arguments are: "all financial activity should have a referee, privacy is dangerous, please legislate who is allowed to do things"
1
20
these arguments always suggest that privacy (speech) is granted only because people don't think speech is dangerous, but privacy (money) is undeserved because money is dangerous
3
31
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Banks, financial services and governments having access to your entire financial history is mass surveillance. Selling and sharing access to it to other companies makes that even more true. I'm not American and I'm not sure what that would have to do with any of this if I was.
2
2
Show replies