This is a platform for engaging in discourse, and I'm not responding to a thread you created. I'm responding to a thread where you're promoting a product with what I think are misleading claims about it. Claiming that it's 'security-focused' is actually quite amusing though.
Conversation
Replying to
Obviously bullying/harassment is never OK but how you've reacted to me is wild. I'm not a security expert or dev, you'll school me there but I can say this whole thread does not come off well. If there is reported proof of your claims I'd love to see it so I can correct myself.
1
Replying to
I'm responding to what you posted and also what the project you're promoting posted themselves. I don't have any issue with you. I have no reason to think you're involved in any abusive behavior, only that you've unfortunately been misled by some inaccurate talking points.
1
Replying to
I've not attacked your character or project, all I did was point out this weird beef. Yet you've feverishly filled up my inbox and look regardless of if your right or wrong, this is a terrible look for a dev. Maybe rethink your approach to trying to promote your project.
2
If I'm wrong (not a security expert/dev) then the burden of proof falls on you with external sources. Are there articles you can cite? Research papers? Documented raids? I'll own my mistake if I'm wrong but I've been given nothing so far.
1
Replying to
Their release notes show the 3.5 month gap without browser and OS security updates, and the rest of the information is public too. I'm not talking about things that aren't disclosed, other than some of the leaks in microG which aren't specific to CalyxOS or the discussion focus.
1
1
You're a member of the community of a YouTube influencer involved in targeting me with fabricated stories, libel and bullying / harassment. It's unfortunate you're believing misinformation from someone that's highly toxic, dishonest and trying to blame their victims for it.
1
1
Replying to
This is borderline harassment at this point. Someone in that community confirmed what you said and I'm trying to do my own research at this point, HOWEVER you're going very out of your way to come after me. I not been toxic to you and I would like the same in return.
2
Even if everything you said is true and I do find that GrapheneOS is a better fit for me as a user, why would I switch after all of this from you today? This thread has not been productive for either of us and should end here.
1
Replying to
I don't want you to use GrapheneOS. I want you to stop spreading misinformation that's harmful to at-risk people and I want you to stop engaging in a campaign of libel and bullying targeting me. Not an appropriate response to someone giving accurate and honest information.
1
1
Your posts in the Techlore room have been archived. You have openly supported and confirmed your ties to a group which has openly engaged in a highly toxic campaign of misinformation and abuse. I didn't respond here expecting you would be part of that, but not surprised about it.
You don't get to support and engage in abusive behavior targeting someone and then move on from it like that. It has been archived, as will any future misinformation or personal attacks targeting me. You chose to be part of toxic communities and to get involved in their abuse.
1
1
We monitor the rooms of that influencer due to his highly toxic behavior and community. It's not harassment to archive these threads. It demonstrates how you were misled which includes you openly stating you watched / believe a video personally targeting me with libel / bullying.
1