Conversation

one very annoying thing about the normie discourse around crypto and privacy "it's untracable super-moneylaundering-money" etc, is that it's not just wrong, it's backwards crypto is LESS PRIVATE than tradfi, and this is a massive fucking problem
16
293
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
It has strong cryptography protecting transaction amounts and stealth addresses are fine. The decoy part of the privacy model isn't perfect and can be analyzed in a probabilistic way. There's a permanent record of everything so leaking any information is quite bad and it does.
1
9
Zcash shielded pool has strong privacy for everything within it but unlike Monero, it has a split between the shielded pool with z-addresses and transparent addresses outside it. Transparent addresses are much more widely supported and often used as an on/off ramp for it.
1
7
For example, we take Bitcoin, Monero and Zcash donations for GrapheneOS and use a Trezor Model T for the main wallet. For Zcash, we can't use a z-address yet since Trezor still has to finish implementing support for it, and we'll also probably wait for support in their wallet.
1
6
Zcash has lack of adoption including by wallets/exchanges (especially z-addresses) while Monero needs a big overhaul. Monero can be a better option in practice because more people use it, it has hardware wallet support already and there isn't a transparent pool as an on/off ramp.
1
4
Ideally Bitcoin would add a shielded pool inspired by Zcash. Could easily get more adoption than any dedicated privacy coin. Such a small chance of it happening now with how contentious changes to the protocol have gotten and how it's so political rather than technical. Still...
1
5
Show replies