Conversation

one very annoying thing about the normie discourse around crypto and privacy "it's untracable super-moneylaundering-money" etc, is that it's not just wrong, it's backwards crypto is LESS PRIVATE than tradfi, and this is a massive fucking problem

293

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

and

It has strong cryptography protecting transaction amounts and stealth addresses are fine. The decoy part of the privacy model isn't perfect and can be analyzed in a probabilistic way. There's a permanent record of everything so leaking any information is quite bad and it does.

Replying to

and

Zcash shielded pool has strong privacy for everything within it but unlike Monero, it has a split between the shielded pool with z-addresses and transparent addresses outside it. Transparent addresses are much more widely supported and often used as an on/off ramp for it.

Replying to

and

For example, we take Bitcoin, Monero and Zcash donations for GrapheneOS and use a Trezor Model T for the main wallet. For Zcash, we can't use a z-address yet since Trezor still has to finish implementing support for it, and we'll also probably wait for support in their wallet.

12:30 AM · Apr 3, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

People can donate to our transparent Zcash address from the shielded pool where no one can see where it originated, but they can see the amount arriving at the transparent address. Ideally it would eventually only be possible to send to a z-address and it would be a clear winner.

Replying to

and

Zcash has lack of adoption including by wallets/exchanges (especially z-addresses) while Monero needs a big overhaul. Monero can be a better option in practice because more people use it, it has hardware wallet support already and there isn't a transparent pool as an on/off ramp.

Show replies