Conversation

Replying to
I've never understood how having entirely proprietary hardware and firmware but avoiding shipping and loading the firmware from the OS somehow makes it open and not proprietary. It's really doing the opposite and making it harder to inspect and control along with less secure.
1
2
They portray choosing a component like a Wi-Fi radio with persistent proprietary firmware as somehow being open and providing freedom because the OS doesn't have to load firmware into it each boot. Really doesn't have make sense and I've started seeing it as simply being a scam.
1
2
Far better to have stateless components where OS has to provide firmware. It makes it clearer which firmware exists and needs to be updated, reduces attack surface, allows OS verified boot to cover firmware instead of trusting each component does signature checks properly, etc.
2