Conversation

The idea that the invention of non-Free "fauxpen" licenses for the purposes of protecting for-profit commercial interests might somehow the fault of GPL / copyleft advocates for using copyright to propagate and protect Software Freedom is ... quite something.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @DanielMicay @_msw_ and 4 others
Pushing restrictive licenses will lead to increasingly broad adoption of restrictive licenses. The only way you're going to convince people not to go down that path is convincing them that copyright is a bad idea. Many people won't follow any of these licenses anyway.
2
12
Replying to
Enforcing ridiculously arcane and poorly understood restrictions on software through a monopoly upheld by state violence is the opposite of protecting freedom. The entire Free Software movement is a sham. All they really protect are abusers not anyone's freedom.
3
Replying to and
That's completely inaccurate. It's far more complicated than that and there isn't even consensus on the rules. GPL forbids you from doing things like using Linux kernel code as a reference in GNU coreutils. It's a major contributor to the fragmentation and technical issues.
1
1
I'll add the people involved in it to the public GrapheneOS ban list used across accounts and shared with other projects. Anyone that has done that or supported doing it via retweets / likes will be banned from multiple communities. Not interested in any more of this nonsense.