Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
If people want an insecure device not meeting the baseline security requirements, then what they want isn't GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS isn't going to roll back our firmware/hardware security standards by 5 years to below Pixel 2 standards or even earlier than that. Missing the point.
1
Replying to
Expect proper hardware encryption support including Weaver via secure element so that there's actually strong encryption for the vast majority of users not using an ~96-bit or higher passphrase. Proper IOMMU isolation for hardware components. Wi-Fi anonymity. And much more...
1
Replying to
GrapheneOS requires high quality hardware/firmware and device support code meeting requirements for it. If you want us to support a non-Pixel device, it's on you to find a device meeting the requirements. We don't think there's currently a non-Pixel device coming close to that.
1
Show replies