Daniel Micay on Twitter: "@LaranjaZukua If people want an insecure device not meeting the baseline security requirements, then what they want isn't GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS isn't going to roll back our firmware/hardware security standards by 5 years to below Pixel 2 standards or even earlier than that. Missing the point." / Twitter

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

If people want an insecure device not meeting the baseline security requirements, then what they want isn't GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS isn't going to roll back our firmware/hardware security standards by 5 years to below Pixel 2 standards or even earlier than that. Missing the point.

10:26 AM · Oct 5, 2021Twitter Web App

Replying to

Please read grapheneos.org/faq#device-sup. Absolutely bare minimum for a device is meeting the bare minimum requirements including proper support for alternative operating systems with all the hardware security features functionality and ongoing monthly security updates for 3-4 years.

grapheneos.org

GrapheneOS Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about GrapheneOS.

1

Replying to

Expect proper hardware encryption support including Weaver via secure element so that there's actually strong encryption for the vast majority of users not using an ~96-bit or higher passphrase. Proper IOMMU isolation for hardware components. Wi-Fi anonymity. And much more...

1

Show replies

Conversation