Conversation

Replying to
The issue is that these tools will inevitably be used against progressives, when it is politically convenient to do so. There are better, community-managed ways to remove harmful information, but FB won’t use those
1
Replying to
Eg: allowing users more control on what they see in their timelines, and in what order, community-managed block lists that people can subscribe to, limiting forwarding/retweets. There’s so many possibilities beyond centralized control
1
1
Replying to and
They'll never be able to repair the harm they caused pretending masks didn't work or required formal training in a misguided attempt to save them for health care workers. That was the government + health agencies and is a major basis for the misinformation spread by others now.
1
Similarly, why is the FDA taking so ridiculously long to give formal approval to the mRNA vaccines? One of the main scare tactics that I see is pointing out they haven't given them non-emergency approval yet, which is true. It has been a long time with many millions getting it.
1
1
There's also now a big push to downplay effectiveness being fully vaccinated. CDC, WHO, etc. should really hire some competent sociologists and statisticians. It was entirely possible to avoid masks and vaccination becoming a political thing if it wasn't played so stupidly.
1
CDC, WHO, FDA, etc. are clearly incompetent and often dishonest. So, who are people going to listen to? At this point, they pretty much have to pay Trump to do a series of ads telling his supporters to get vaccinated while taking credit for developing them. I think it'd work.