Conversation

Parts for temporary new workstation which gets to become a gaming PC once Zen 3 Threadripper is available: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Noctua NH-D15 ASUS Prime X570-Pro 4x 32GB G.SKILL 16-22-22-42 DDR4 3600 Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB Fractal Design Meshify 2 Reusing an existing GPU and PSU.
2
13
It gets to inherit a reference design GeForce 1080 Ti and 80 Plus Titanium PSU (EVGA SuperNova T2 850W). GPU can be replaced later when it gets to stop being a workstation. Nice that I was finally able to get new CPU and other parts at proper retail prices. Chip shortage sucks.
2
6
Replying to
I've never had an SSD fail, let alone a high end one with high durability NAND and higher quality parts. It would be a major inconvenience but not a major problem beyond wasted time. RAID only makes things worse with a high-end NVMe SSD. Already insane overkill performance too.
1
I prefer having fewer things that can go wrong and from my perspective, redundancy via RAID only adds more that can go wrong. If the SSD is going to fail, I need a new SSD anyway, and I'd rather just deal with that. I don't want to deal with another layer of latency/complexity.
1
Replying to
Look at the specs for samsung.com/semiconductor/. 5GB/s sequential write, 7GB/s sequential read, 1,000,000 QD32 IOPS, 60,000 QD1 IOPS. It's immensely overkill for my needs. I need the Pro line because huge amounts of data is written but the performance is really not a factor.
It's substantially faster than the Samsung 960 Pro 2TB in my old workstation but that won't make any difference. Having 128GB of memory means there's a massive amount of cached data and plenty of space to buffer writes. Latency is something that does matter a lot though.
1
RAID hurts latency and IOPS. It's not really suited to the age of high-end NVMe drives. It's also really hard to actually be I/O bound with this kind of drive. Latency is what really ends up bottlenecking performance for I/O for anything that I'm likely to do, not the rest.
2
Show replies