Conversation

Replying to
We started with the IRC channel as the main room and used an inherently bridged Matrix room. However, 90% of the users in the channel ended up being on Matrix. Main disruption for us is needing to move to standalone Matrix rooms. It's fine since we needed to upgrade room anyway.
2
1
Replying to
It ended up this way because we treated them as equal and always referenced it as a bridged Matrix/IRC channel with people having a choice of platform. I preferred IRC which is why that was the canonical channel, but our users clearly prefer Matrix and Telegram over it, by far.
1
2
Replying to and
If we actually mentioned the Telegram group on our site, I think that would be by far the biggest... but we want people to use the Matrix rooms so we can control it rather than Telegram controlling it. People made the Telegram group on their own, then gave us control of it.
1
1
Replying to
Ended up deploying matterbridge bridging across Matrix, Telegram, libera.chat and OFTC. It's not that bad. Need to make some tweaks to prevent abuse via display names. Made sure that it shows a prefix for the origin to avoid impersonation across different platforms.
2
Replying to and
Frustrates me how much stuff is designed without considering the potential for abuse. Only major gripes I have with Matrix at this point are how much it enables abuse via federation, poor moderation tools and inadequate interface in clients like Element for anti-abuse/moderation.
1
Show replies