Conversation

it’s kind of amazing how the FSF trying to slip Stallman back into their ranks on the down low has caused the entire internet to notice we don’t actually need the FSF for anything for a good twenty years now
26
808
Replying to and
Maybe open source is all we need after all - it's basically the same as free software but without the restrictions and the convoluted logic to explain why it's somehow "more free". The world has changed so much in the last 20 years, including the relevance of "free software"
1
14
Replying to and
my gripe with free software is that it doesn't go nearly far enough and what it does it does ineffectively i happen to release my work as 0BSD not because i believe in the specific brand of "open source" as defined by OSI but because i consider copyright regressive
2
38
There's an implicit assumption by nearly every open source project that the contributions are being made under the license of the project. It's a good idea to have this explicitly written down. Similarly, it's a good idea to explicitly cover the expectations for trademarks.
2
3
Trademarks are important for dealing with scammers, impersonation, etc. I think that makes more sense than the way copyright and patent laws work. You have common law trademarks even if you don't register them but you gradually lose your ability to enforce it if you ignore it.
1