The fact that no real people have reached out on their own account (except one of your devs on Telegram) shows that your community could care less about your antics.
Conversation
There are no sockpuppet accounts. You're just making it up with no basis. We have never used any sockpuppet accounts. You're just a completely dishonest person participating in an organized misinformation campaign. I recommend people look at all the retweets / likes on all this.
1
1
This back and forth is insane. CH people accusing every user defending GOS of being a sockpuppet. You accusing Seth of being part of an "organized misinformation campaign". Neither of these claims are based on any actual evidence.
2
1
3
Thanks for jumping in here, you're the only real person who has engaged with me on CHOS/GOS in good-faith so far as a Graphene user, and I really respect your input!
1
4
I hope I have not mischaracterised your situation in anything I have said here. I just want a secure FOSS phone, all this drama is mostly pointless.
1
4
Not going to get a secure or FOSS phone from a company that's based around poorly copying open source code, making it into a closed source product and then using the revenue from selling it to cause harm to the open source projects where it originates through any means possible.
1
6
I don't have any knowledge of the twitter issues better Graphene and CH, and their respective supporters.
My understanding is the split happened years ago at this point. Are you saying any further development from CH is the result of repackaging Graphene's code?
2
Yes, they forked my repositories from GitHub (the original repositories are in the GrapheneOS repository now) and since then have continued taking our code without giving credit to us. They took hardened_malloc and many other things entire developed after the split.
2
2
They heavily depend on us for our work porting the changes to each new release of Android and our development of new privacy and security feature. They mostly have a fork of our legacy code without all the improvements but they have taken a lot of our newer code too.
1
3
They don't understand it and they kept around certain of my features long past the point where they were obsoleted by upstream Android changes among other major mistakes. It's very apparent to actual security researchers / engineers and other infosec people.