Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

If a single real person had responded to my tweets or blog post, then yes, it may be a community defending you. Instead you've chosen to use new or temp accounts on Twitter to harass me. Anyone can check any of my previous tweets on Copperhead for evidence of this.

Replying to

The fact that no real people have reached out on their own account (except one of your devs on Telegram) shows that your community could care less about your antics.

Replying to

There are no sockpuppet accounts. You're just making it up with no basis. We have never used any sockpuppet accounts. You're just a completely dishonest person participating in an organized misinformation campaign. I recommend people look at all the retweets / likes on all this.

Replying to

This back and forth is insane. CH people accusing every user defending GOS of being a sockpuppet. You accusing Seth of being part of an "organized misinformation campaign". Neither of these claims are based on any actual evidence.

Replying to

Newish accounts posting in favour of GOS are not automatically sockpuppets controlled by Daniel, and Seth reacting to being at the pointy end of some harassing behaviour does not make him part of a coordinated misinformation campaign.

Replying to

I should be more clear here, "sockpuppet" may not be the right term. If you look at any of my previous pro-CHOS tweets, you will see multiple accounts reply each time, new accounts each time, all with 0-5 followers/follows. You will also see new "anonymous***" accounts.

Replying to

These accounts almost always use the exact same language, share the same link(s), and reply close together. I have also received similar DMs on Telegram from users in the Copperhead TG room that follow me and DM spam then delete accounts.

Replying to

I am not implying Daniel is controlling them directly, just that someone is coordinating a reply spam campaign as far as I can tell, or multiple GOS users are using the same tactics and copypasta.

Replying to

This is the simplest and most likely explanation. There are clearly pretty toxic personalities on both sides of what should be a purely technical issue.

Replying to

A war being waged against GrapheneOS, myself and the other developers on multiple fronts is not a technical issue. They're free to stop spreading misinformation & making other attacks on us at any point. It's Copperhead's choice to make a product based on our work and to harm us.

1:55 PM · Feb 19, 2021Twitter Web App