I have harassed no one, but from the day I posted my original blog post you have sicced your sockpuppets and new accounts on me and my followers and fellow community members.
All because I dared to donate my free time to share about something I enjoyed.
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
If a single real person had responded to my tweets or blog post, then yes, it may be a community defending you.
Instead you've chosen to use new or temp accounts on Twitter to harass me.
Anyone can check any of my previous tweets on Copperhead for evidence of this.
2
1
3
The fact that no real people have reached out on their own account (except one of your devs on Telegram) shows that your community could care less about your antics.
1
3
There are no sockpuppet accounts. You're just making it up with no basis. We have never used any sockpuppet accounts. You're just a completely dishonest person participating in an organized misinformation campaign. I recommend people look at all the retweets / likes on all this.
1
1
This back and forth is insane. CH people accusing every user defending GOS of being a sockpuppet. You accusing Seth of being part of an "organized misinformation campaign". Neither of these claims are based on any actual evidence.
2
1
3
Newish accounts posting in favour of GOS are not automatically sockpuppets controlled by Daniel, and Seth reacting to being at the pointy end of some harassing behaviour does not make him part of a coordinated misinformation campaign.
2
4
Seth's reactions being retweeted by people involved in CH does not make him part of the coordination. It's pretty obvious that CH people would react by sharing those type of posts, without any need for coordination.
1
3
You are both talking past eachother and over reacting. The GOS/CH dispute should just be settled in court on the facts, and I will continue to recommend the FOSS non-corporate option without expensive licences.
1
2
They're the ones choosing to a misinformation war against GrapheneOS along with threatening/intimidating anyone who contributes to the project, even people that are underage. You say it should be settled in court but they're making daily attacks on us causing lots of harm.
2
GrapheneOS not a for-profit project. We're not selling any products. We're focused on building privacy and security technology. They're focusing all their resources on causing harm to us in any way that they can, and on marketing a product simply copy pasting our codebase.
This is primarily not a legal dispute. It's largely a personal vendetta against me by James Donaldson and now also Max. Their poorly formed lawsuit against was primarily a way to exhaust my time, energy and resources along with intimidating people to stop them from contributing.
1
They did not file a serious lawsuit against us. They used a bargain bin lawyer working out of a shared WeWork space with little trial experience and lack of relevant experience on IP law to file a poorly conceived lawsuit as part of overwhelming us with attacks on the project.
2
Show replies