Conversation

Paul Barnacle
@PaulBarnacle
Replying to
@PaulBarnacle
and
@DanielMicay
Seriously go back and read my replies without your tin foil hat on and find something that supports any of the "lapdog" claims you have made. I find it odd how you just flipped from being quite factual to name calling, I understand that you need to defend your reputation
1
Daniel Micay
@DanielMicay
Replying to
@PaulBarnacle
I initially engaged with you assuming good faith and you demonstrated that to be incredibly incorrect. I'm not going to try convincing a spineless and unethical person who supports a scam with facts. It's pretty clear you don't care what happened and won't actually check it.
2
Paul Barnacle
@PaulBarnacle
Replying to
@DanielMicay
Well from my point of view, you obfuscated the facts. Digging through all the crap you wrote and my own research it would seem like - you wrote the code and copperhead forked that code. All this crap could have been saved if only you had have been brief and concise.
1
Daniel Micay
@DanielMicay
Replying to
@PaulBarnacle
That's what I said. I started the project in 2014. I founded a company with 2 other people (James Donaldson and Dan McGrady). I had agreements with them about how it would work. There were no written contracts about anything beyond making a company and dividing shares. That's it.
1
Daniel Micay
@DanielMicay
Replying to
@PaulBarnacle
The company was started as a security consulting company and was supposed to sell contract work and support. It was not supposed to be based around my project. It was explicitly agreed upon that my open source work would remain under my control and ownership, and it did.
1
Daniel Micay
@DanielMicay
Replying to
@DanielMicay
and
@PaulBarnacle
The company was not starting 'using code' that I wrote. My project was not the basis for the company. The company failed to become an actual security consulting company and ended up not having anything beyond selling people phones flashed with my open source project.
2
Paul Barnacle
@PaulBarnacle
Replying to
@DanielMicay
OK, now we are on the same page. Thank you for taking the time to explain. Again I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Now I have both sides of the story I can advise a colleague / friend on the best course of action.
2
Daniel Micay
@DanielMicay
Replying to
@PaulBarnacle
If you want the truth ask one of the many people like
@thegrugq
who have closely followed it from near the beginning and are well aware that James is peddling false narratives about what happened. It's not my word against James. Many people know that what he says is a lie.
2
5