Conversation

Replying to
that is in fact what happened the problem isn't a windows license (pirating LTSC is a moral imperative) but the fact that in everyday interactions windows these days got less usable than late 2000s linux desktop
2
1
Replying to and
i've watched my roommate--a person whose technical skills i respect--spend several weeks trying to set up a dual booting nixos/win10 system with uefi i believe she's on the fifth reinstall from scratch, and having seen that breakage, i know i won't do much better, either
1
2
Replying to and
Used to be in a tiny IRC channel with someone that used Xen to be able to run Windows for gaming with PCIe passthrough. 90% of their posts in that channel (not really a technical channel) was complaining about PCIe passthrough breaking and asking for help debugging it.
1
5
Replying to and
yeah I've tried it, hit an issue with PAT/MTRR and write combining ranges in graphical memory, tried fixing it, decided KVM it is (I might actually set up KVM with PCIe passthrough if wine doesn't work out)
1
2
Replying to and
I personally prefer having Windows on a totally different machine for gaming. For some reason I still have my better GPU in my workstation from back when I thought dual booting was a good idea but... that'll be fixed when I replace it with a new workstation.
2
Replying to and
I have a spare TB nvme waiting for me to drop linux on it in my big workstation, and I've been looking at various distros update behavior in fear. I think systemd-boot is going to be ok, but half the distros hold it wrong
1
Replying to and
I mostly mean I want something like a more modern take of the system I designed for fuchsia, but moved over to linux, which is too different to describe in a tweet. clear is close, but clear has some unfortunate opinions in weird places, and they don't accept patches
1
1
Replying to and
I'd like a desktop OS using an approach like update_engine with a well-defined core base system and then containers for development but it doesn't exist (ChromeOS doesn't count) so I just stick to something that I get the closest to unaltered software with upstream defaults.
1
Show replies
I'm not a systemd fan at all, but I prefer having the full adoption of systemd in Arch as opposed to a distribution with a mess of different approaches and all kinds of distribution-specific scripts and configurations. I really don't have the time and energy to deal with Debian.
1
Replying to and
Right, exactly, the debian/ubuntu half and half mess is a real disaster. The more I use systemd the more I like it, and they fix issues on average in less than a week after I submit them, so +1
1
Show replies