Conversation

Replying to and
Yeah, exactly. Since they were using AWS, I assume they were using assorted AWS APIs. They can't simply self-host their services and have it working again. There's a lot more involved than simply setting up some servers with standard services. They need a bunch of development.
1
2
Replying to and
If I was building that kind of large platform, I'd want to do it on top of something that I could self-host. Thankfully, I don't work on anything like that and have no plans for it. The kinds of services we need are all static file servers or services without cross-account data.
1
2
Replying to and
I don't think they ever seriously considered that it would be difficult to find hosting. Hosting user-generated content with nearly non-existent moderation is enough to make that a problem even without going out of the way to attract the audience that they brought over to it.
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
They don't realize their party has gone completely off the rails. They genuinely see it as creating a social media platform for conservatives in the US. They don't realize that's not what they are anymore or what they created. So glad that I don't live in the US. It's unreal.
2
1
Our tweets explained GrapheneOS is open source and can be used by anyone following the rules in our copyright licenses and for our trademarks. It stressed the importance of following the rules. If it's a fork of GrapheneOS it should be presented that way. I don't know what it is.
1
1
Show replies