Yeah copperhead is a bad actor
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Question was for Raker57 actually.
Having used both, I’ve found Copperhead more reliable with better performance as well as proper support.
2
6
Please note that is selling devices using CopperheadOS and has a financial interest in spreading misinformation about GrapheneOS and promoting their product. They are actively violating our open source licenses and taking our code without credit.
2
5
Copperhead has threatened and harassed multiple open source developers, while at the same time copy-pasting their code and fraudulently presenting it as their own. It's easy to check and verify the ownership/authorship and origin of code like this.
renlord.com/posts/2020-03-
1
2
Daniel, you accused me of abuse for running software that you didn't like.
You need help.
1
5
No, I didn't do that. Repeatedly misrepresenting my statements and attacking me is not going to change what is happening. You're just trying to distract from the fraud that you're now participating in to earn money for yourself.
1
2
I'm not lying about anything. Again, you're misrepresenting my statements. Nowhere in that tweet do I make any claim that you are supporting abuse and harm simply for using CopperheadOS. That is not what happened. You're not being truthful at all.
You literally say I am supporting abuse.
I'd understand if English wasn't your first language but I can only assume you are a consummate liar.
Court will be an unwelcome experience for you.
1
2
That's exactly what you were doing and have doubled down on doing. You're the one lying about the origin of the code that you're selling and the fact that you're in violation of the open source licenses. Trying to project things onto me is a pretty poor way of addressing this.
1
1
Show replies