Yeah copperhead is a bad actor
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Question was for Raker57 actually.
Having used both, I’ve found Copperhead more reliable with better performance as well as proper support.
2
6
Please note that is selling devices using CopperheadOS and has a financial interest in spreading misinformation about GrapheneOS and promoting their product. They are actively violating our open source licenses and taking our code without credit.
2
5
I had no financial interest. You told me not to use your code so I set up a company because I just wanted a working android device for the love of God.
Own goal on your part.
1
4
You're using our work and you're in violation of our open source licenses. You've taken to regularly spreading misinformation as part of your attempts to harm the open source project that you're leeching off for profit.
2
4
github.com/GrapheneOS/har was written entirely after the split with Copperhead and has a license requiring attribution. CopperheadOS has included an old version of this without following the license, and you're selling devices based on it. This is just one of many examples of this.
2
1
You can't actually counter what's being said so the best you can do is trying to make personal attacks against me. I'm also not the only open source developer that's being screwed over. GrapheneOS has 6 core developers and more than one has been threatened and had code stolen.